
That they don't track bugs effectively, that I can understand. As reported before by Slaven, they were looking into improving that tool or looking out for a replacement.Sandy wrote:No, my point is simply that PSI does not track bugs effectively and it does not fix many known bugs in its products.
I agree with you that I'm optimistic about it, as we already saw proof of their willingness to solve existing bugs and problems. Remember the way Draft has been changed.I only bought the whole unfortunate subject up in the first place in response to Eric's (again I will say it) polliannaish claim in the spite of PSI recent history that: "I'm sure most of them will be adressed during the next beta run."

Whether all bugs will be fixed, depends on whether that bug can be reproduced, same as priority, time and resources needed to fix that bug.
What I don't understand is your stance to always go back to the past. Maybe it's because your list isn't adressed.
I do give them more credit for what they're trying to achieve now.
Also with all the new products hitting the market, I'm sure they have their hands full with all support requests and future plans.
I also didn't say ALL bugs will get fixed, because that's unrealistic.
English isn't my first language, so I'm a bit restricted on how to respond to a question, what words I should use and so on.
Sometimes I do make mistakes in my choice of words and if every post is going to be analyzed, it makes it even more difficult for me to provide support to whoever is asking.

If you take 2 minutes to write something down, I'll need more then 5 minutes to express myself clearly. Sometimes it's even hard to find the right words or knowing how to write it down correctly.

Give it some slack Sandy.
