desertgal wrote:Ok, I just changed the Good Score to 3 it was at 4 or 5.
I have a filter to Increase the Junk Score if the Content Type is Not Plain. It seems like most of the junk is either ASCII or Multi-part Mixed.
I just checked mail & this is from one of the headers
X-Poco-Spam-DNSBL: Received from IP address (81.172.56.192)
Found in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org (+15)
Found in bl.spamcop.net (+15)
Not in list.dsbl.org (+0)
Not in dnsbl.njabl.org (+0)
Found in dnsbl.sorbs.net (+15)
Debug - v1.19 #spamscore 45 #waitattempt 5 #timeout 8 #mode 1
X-Poco-Scored: +45
Ok, this is starting to make more sense, you are also running the Spam-DNSBL script. In this case it has found three matches each of which have increased the junk score by 15 points (thus a total after the script has run of J+45).
desertgal wrote:X-Poco-Score-Detail: -3 [%BAYES%=P=0;T=85;BIAS=+30] (%bayes% P=0;T=85;Bias=+30)
Here Poco's Bayesian filter has run and thinks the message is not junk and subtracted 3 from the overall score (which is now +42).
desertgal wrote:X-Poco-Score-Detail: +3 [X-MAILER=] (X-Mailer )
Poco's standard built in junk mail filters have added 3 to the junk score because the message does not have an "X-Mailer" header (this identifies the client email program used to create the message). The score at this point should be +45.
desertgal wrote:X-Poco-Score: +67
I'm confused at this point as to why the score should be set to +67, something has added an additional 22 points to the junk score. I cannot tell from what you've posted what that could be.
desertgal wrote:X-Poco-Score-Detail: +2 [FROM=%ADDRESSBOOKS%] (From %addressbooks%)
Here the junk mail filters have checked to see if the message is from someone in your address books. It has determined that the sender is not and so has added 2 to the junk score (now +47 by my reckoning).
desertgal wrote:X-Poco-Scored: +67
Poco thinks the final overall score for this message is +67.
desertgal wrote:X-Poco-Score-Exceeds: 14
Poco says that the message score exceeds the threshold you set and has moved the message to the junk mail folder.
desertgal wrote:It was placed in the Junk Mailbox, but not deleted.
It is entirely possible that this message was not deleted because of the way Poco's filters work. Once an incoming message filter moves a message from the In mailbox it becomes unavailable to subsequent incoming message filters. To overcome this you could try setting up an OnAdd event for the Junk Mail mailbox (Tools | Events). This
might allow you to delete the message.