Obviously the thread I was working in got lost in the forum "transfer" process along with my username and password. :-)
Whatever, I was discussing the effectivness of PocoMail's Junk Filtering when put up against K-9. I was also having a major difficulty getting PocoMail to drop any junk what-so-ever into the Junk folder. I even did an over-install and that did not work so I simply saved my ini's and my complete mailbox folder and subfolders, uninstalled, reinstalled and slipped in my ini's and folders. Uniquely, mail started going to the Junk folder.
After testing Poco's junk filter for 10 days I gave up because it was obvious it is not yet up to par with k-9 or PopFile. About the highest I could get was a little over 92%. Perhaps that sounds okay but consider this: In the past 5 days I have had 531 mails go thru K-9 with 302 good, 229 spam and 1 good mail mis-identified as spam. That gives me 99.81% detection in that timeframe. I think the PocoMail developers would do better if they'd simply drop all those other filtering rules they have in the junk filter and get the bayesian filter up to speed. Just a thought .... a K-9 plugin into PocoMail would give it a tremendous spam filtering capability.
So, fire at will ...... he's over there - - - - - > :-)
Trapper